Who knew that Joseph Smith, the prophet and founder of Mormonism who said he discovered golden plates in upstate New York, written in strange hieroglyphics that he “translated” and published as the Book of Mormon, once ran as a candidate for President of the United States? It seemed bizarre to me.
I veer between the stresses of caretaking and the delightful absorption in work, reading and thinking about something other than my husband’s health. Presently, I’m preoccupied with the history of Mormons and confess that I’ve always been interested in what some might consider religious eccentricities. I remember when Mitt Romney was a presidential candidate in 2012, and there was a lot of skepticism about whether a Mormon could win the election. Many people said Mormons aren’t Christians and made fun of Romney, simply because of his religion.
But Mormonism may be the fastest growing faith group in America-- and Mormons want respect. On June 29, the New York Times published an article by Elizabeth Dias in which she wrote that “Russell M. Nelson, the church’s president, said [in August 2018] that God had ‘impressed upon my mind the importance of the name he has revealed for his church.’ “Church members should no longer call themselves Mormons, …. Instead, they should use the church’s full name and refer to themselves as members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints... As he is revered as a living prophet [as all the church presidents have since Joseph Smith], the announcement had divine weight.”
This change strikes me as an attempt to declare to the world that “Mormons” are really Christians. It’s also an effort to counter charges that Mormons are weird and dangerous—a perception fueled by Jon Krakauer’s Under the Banner of Heaven (2004) about extreme Mormon fundamentalists who practice polygamy and tend towards violence. No wonder the “Mormon” church wants to be known under a different name.
I wanted to know more about Mormonism, and being fascinated by history and the origins of things, I had already started looking at books and articles published by and about Mormons in the nineteenth century. Specifically, i was interested in when they first became a religious group with the legendary Joseph Smith as their founder, spiritual leader and first “president.” And now I’ve come across a book written by Charles MacKay, a prolific Scottish writer, journalist and poet, who in 1852 published The Mormons: or Latter-day saints with memoirs of the life and death of Joseph Smith, the "American Mahomet”. Mackay’s book was a historical, serious attempt to understand the group, and included original documents as Mackay told their early history, their way of life, their suffering and persecution as Mormons were forced to move from place to place.
In 1844, the Mormons, having been violently driven from Missouri, were living at Nauvoo, Illinois, where they had built a town on the Mississippi River and a Temple. 1844 was also the year of a presidential election in America, so Joseph Smith’s followers at Nauvoo nominated him as, “Candidate for Presidentship of the United States.” Not that Joseph Smith was under any illusion that he could win, but he took this nomination as an opportunity to issue “an address to the American people,” presenting his views of government. Within a few months, Smith was murdered by a mob in a jail in Carthage, Illinois.
Joseph Smith began by quoting the Declaration of Independence about how all people are created equal, endowed with equal rights—as if this was the true America-- but immediately he pointed out that “some two or three millions of people are held as slaves for life, because the spirit in them is covered with a darker skin than ours.” Looking to the Bible, he declared that “God hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth.” He spoke against slavery, racism and injustice with the passionate outrage of the prophets in the Old Testament.
Joseph Smith, of course, had his limitations, especially in regards to women. Only months before, he had published another “revelation,” a divine “commandment” on polygamy (the “spiritual marriage” doctrine), saying men could have multiple wives. The early church leaders practiced “plural marriage.” Women and wives were given to men (like property or land) for the sole purpose of “replenishing” the earth, Smith said. These days, the Mormon Church has long abandoned polygamy (though some extremists still practice it), but the church has been criticized for its positions on the rights of gays, and women, who cannot become priests, let alone “presidents” who can receive divine “revelations.” Joseph Smith surely did not think of women as equal to men, but he was radical in his time in attacking slavery, insisting on equality of “men.” I know what he would he say if he saw immigrants, and their children separated from their mothers, put in cages or “holding centers” (the phrase reminds me of cows and pigs awaiting slaughter) on the border with Mexico.
But back to Smith’s assessment of the state of America in1844. After invoking the original ideal of the Declaration of Independence, Joseph Smith surveyed the Presidents of America, beginning with George Washington. He quoted the noble sentiments from their inaugural addresses until he got to Martin Van Buren: “our blooming republic began to decline under the withering touch of Martin van Buren,” who (Smith pointed out) supported the pro-slavery states. Now, Smith lamented, America’s “greatness” has “departed.” We have “demagogues.” “No honest man can doubt that the glory of American liberty is on the wane.” When I read his words, I think: he could just as well be talking about America in 2019 in our run-up to the 2020 election.
Joseph Smith laid out his policies for what he would do if he were elected president. His concern was emancipation. No wonder, given the suffering of the Mormons that were beaten, jailed, killed, forced out of their homes. But his concern with liberty was more inclusive.
He first proposed: reduce Congress by half! “curtail the offices of government in pay, number, and power.” Next, the inhabitants of “Slave States” should petition “legislators to abolish slavery by the year 1850 [that is, in six years] or now.” (I think of how some state legislatures have very recently restricted women’s rights, their access to abortions). State legislatures should pardon every convict and bless them, saying “Go and sin no more.” (I think of our prisons, overcrowded with minorities and the poor who don’t get the same “justice” as white men or the wealthy). “Break off the shackles of the poor black man, and hire them to work like other human beings.” “Give everyman his constitutional freedom.” This was the liberation of the people promised in Leviticus 25.10 (“Proclaim liberty throughout the land, unto all the Inhabitants thereof”), which is inscribed on the Liberty Bell.
Our Democratic candidates for President in 2020 are now laying out their policies, promising a better, more equal and just America at a moment when our democracy is under attack from within. Are not Joseph Smith’s assumptions about government and the dignity of human beings echoed in the statements of our candidates and their proposals for addressing the problems we face? I’m thinking about how women are still not free, how many men (and male legislators) think they have the right to control women’s bodies (women are given to them?), through sexual assault and by denying them access to safe abortions and even Planned Parenthood. Sometimes I think it’s the remnant of the old idea that men plant their “seed” in women’s bodies and then worry that their “seed” will be destroyed, even men who don’t accept the responsibilities of fatherhood.
I used to think Joseph Smith was just weird, a megalomaniac, a self-proclaimed prophet. But I’m beginning to think that there is more to him. Yes, this dead white man thought he channeled God and he was hardly a champion of women’s rights. But in his assertion of the freedom and dignity of the human being, his sense that America has departed from our founding ideals, I believe he still has something to say to us, reminding us how much work has yet to be done.